Planet PostgreSQL

Syndicate content
Planet PostgreSQL
Updated: 1 year 21 hours ago

Joe Abbate: The Future of Pyrseas: Part 2

20 June, 2016 - 23:54

When I started working on Pyrseas, I reviewed several other products. Robert Brewer’s Post Facto was probably the one with the most unique design. Although it compared database schemas in order to generate SQL to synch them up, it did not store database object definitions in a standard VCS repository. Rather, it used a Postgres database as the repository analog.

While Post Facto’s design certainly influenced Pyrseas, there is one aspect of  the former that, unfortunately, I did not emulate.

The Dependables

As any developer knows, database objects have dependencies on each other: table A has a primary key PK1, table B is declared with a foreign key dependent on PK1, function C is dependent on type X, view D is based on table A and includes a call to function C.

Pyrseas currently deals with these dependencies in an object-specific manner. For example, it does at least two passes through pg_class objects (tables, views, sequences, etc.) in order to create, alter or drop these objects in the correct order. However, this ad hoc approach can result in incorrect sequencing of generated SQL statements in some cases, particularly those like view D above.

The missing feature from Post Facto that avoids this conundrum? If you answered topological sort you were obviously paying attention in your Algorithms class. If you didn’t, may I suggest chapter 15, “Devising and engineering an algorithm: Topological Sort” of Bertrand Meyer’s Touch of Class.

Daniele’s Quest

Over two years ago, someone opened an issue about the need to create primary keys before creating views. Later, Daniele Varrazzo reported another issue with dependencies.

Many of you Postgres users will recognize Daniele as the maintainer of Psycopg, the popular Python PG adapter, which of course is used by Pyrseas.  Daniele and I chatted online, I mentioned Post Facto’s solution and he, fortuitously and generously, started implementing a topological sort on a deptrack branch of Pyrseas.

We then collaborated for about eight months. He did most of the initial coding and I ran tests and fixed some issues. Unfortunately, Daniele is very busy, with a full-time job, Psycopg and other interests, so the work came to a near standstill.

Where We Stand

The last time changes were submitted to the deptrack branch, about six months ago, only four tests failed (out of over 600) running on both Python 2.7 and 3.4 against Postgres 9.3. Regrettably, three of those tests are integration and functional tests, so correcting those is critical to adding this feature.

In addition, although most tests complete successfully, the run times have been impacted severely. This will require an effort at re-optimizing performance before releasing the changes. Last but not least, the implementation needs internal documentation so that it can be properly maintained.

Sadly, I have not had much time or incentives to address these shortcomings. Are there any Pyrseas, Postgres or Python enthusiasts looking for a challenge?

Filed under: Postgres, Python, Version control

Colin Copeland: Query Expressions are Amazing

20 June, 2016 - 14:30

The Django 1.8 release added support for complex query expressions. The documentation has some nice examples but they don't do justice to how crazy awesome these are. In this post, we will go through some additional examples of how to leverage these expressions.

Django has had one form of a query expression for several years now: the F expression. F() can be used to reference an existing column in a query. This is often used for atomic update operations, such as incrementing a counter. However, F can also be used to compare two columns on a model when filtering. For instance, we may be interested in users who haven't logged in since their first two weeks on the site. That requires comparing the value of the last_login column and the date_joined on the standard User model from contrib.auth:

from datetime import timedelta from django.contrib.auth.models import User from django.db.models import F from django.utils.timezone import now # Create some fake data: 10 active users and 20 inactive ones today = now() active_count = 10 inactive_count = 20 for i in range(1, active_count + inactive_count + 1): active = i <= active_count prefix = 'in' if active else '' domain = '' if i % 3 == 0 else '' attributes = { 'username': '{}active-{}'.format(prefix, i), 'email': '{}active-{}@{}'.format(prefix, i, domain), 'date_joined': today - timedelta(days=30), 'last_login': today - timedelta(days=0 if active else 21), } User.objects.create(**attributes) # Query inactive users inactive = User.objects.filter(last_login__lte=F('date_joined') + timedelta(days=14))

The F expression supports basic arithmetic operations including some date math, as seen in the example above. However, it is still very limiting in comparison to what is available in SQL.

Relational databases such as Postgresql support a number of built-in functions which you can leverage in the ORM using the Func expression added in 1.8. For example, you may want to examine the email domains of your user base. For that, you might use the split_part function in Postgresql to extract the domain of the email address column. To normalize the domain values you can compose this with the built-in Lower expression:

# Continued from above from django.contrib.auth.models import User from django.db.models import F, Func, Value from django.db.models.functions import Lower qs = User.objects.annotate(domain=Lower( Func(F('email'), Value('@'), Value(2), function='split_part')))

This translates into the SQL call split_part("auth_user"."email", @, 2) and annotates every user with a new domain attribute which is the domain of their email address. The value 2 passed to split_part says to take the second value after splitting the string. Unlike Python this is a 1-based index rather than a 0-based index. With this we can find out what the most popular domains are for the users:

# Continued from above from django.db.models import Count popular = qs.values('domain').annotate(count=Count('id')).order_by('-count') print(popular) # Result # [{'count': 20, 'domain': ''}, # {'count': 10, 'domain': ''}]

As noted in the example, this returns a list of dictionaries of the form {'domain': <domain name>, 'count': #} ordered by the highest counts first. We can take this even further using the conditional expressions.

Two more new expressions Case and When can be used to build conditional aggregates. For instance, we may want to only count users who have logged in recently:

# Continued from above from django.db.models import Case, When from django.utils.timezone import now active = When( last_login__isnull=False, last_login__gte=now() - timedelta(days=14), then=Value(1))

active defines the conditional expression when the last_login is not null and is a date later than 14 days ago. If there is a match then this row will add the value of 1 to the aggregate. This conditional expression can be passed into an aggregate expression such as Count, Sum, or Avg. To get the popular domains, we’ll count the number of active users for a given email domain.

# Continued from above popular = qs.values('domain').annotate( count=Count('id'), active_count=Count(Case(active))).order_by('-active_count') print(popular) # Result # [{'active_count': 7, 'count': 20, 'domain': ''}, # {'active_count': 3, 'count': 10, 'domain': ''}]

This adds a new key/value to the resulting dictionaries which include the number of active users for the domain. Here has the most active registered users but it also has the most registered users overall. For one last usage, we can look at the percent of users for each domain who are active again using the F expression:

# Continued from above popular = popular.annotate( percent_active=Value(1.0) * F('active_count') / F('count') * Value(100) ).order_by('-percent_active') print(popular) # Result # [{'active_count': 7, 'count': 20, 'domain': '', 'percent_active': 35}, # {'active_count': 3, 'count': 10, 'domain': '', 'percent_active': 30}]

Again this adds another data point to the returned list of dictionaries which is the percent of active users. Now we know which email domains are associated with the most users, the most recently logged in users, and the percent of users with that domain who have been recently active.

Query expressions like Func allow you to make more complex queries, leveraging more of your chosen database’s power without having to drop to raw SQL. Combined with the aggregation and conditional expressions you can roll up additional statistics about your data set using the expressive power of the ORM. I hope these examples give a good overview of some of the queries that are now easy to handle in the ORM and which previously required raw SQL.